top of page

Eden was made for us, not us for Eden

  • 2 hours ago
  • 10 min read

A quick note:

Recently I’ve been hearing the word “foundation” a lot in Christian circles and so a few mornings ago as I wrapped up my study on a previous chapter of the bible I felt the call to go back to the beginning and really look at what God wanted to tell us through Genesis. As I read through it I felt like every verse was jumping out at me with new insights and revelations and as I started to write them down I knew that I was being challenged to form them into a coherent essay or blog post or whatever you want to call these. I haven't written and published one in a while and so maybe this was God calling me to step back into this. So I committed to it and to putting my thoughts out for you all.


Picture of the Garden of Eden with two trees next to a body of water and a lion and a lamb in the photo

A Study of Genesis 2 & 3


As we read the account of Eden in Genesis 2 and 3, it’s easy to assume that humanity was created for the Garden as if Eden was the goal and we failed to live up to the perfection. Before I really started this study I probably would've guessed that the Garden was created first and man was created right there in the middle of the garden.


But scripture paints an entirely different picture. See, Eden was not the purpose of man, Eden was a provision for man.


Genesis 2:8 “8Then the Lord God planted a garden in Eden in the east, and there he placed the man he had made.”


See, God had created Adam first. Then He created Eden. Then He placed Adam into it.


From the very beginning Eden was created as provision, not purpose. Originally I was going to say that Eden was created as a Gift but the more I thought about it I didn't think that was strong enough. Saying something “was provision” implies a few things.


First, there was some kind of real need. It implies that there was a lack, something that we were missing.


Second, that need was met in a timely or meaningful way. 


And third, it had purpose, it was not just coincidence. Keep those three things in mind as we continue on.


The First Command 

Before Eve was created God gave the first command to Adam, to not eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. 


Genesis  2:15-17 15The Lord God placed the man in the Garden of Eden to tend and watch over it. 16But the Lord God warned him, “You may freely eat the fruit of every tree in the garden— 17except the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. If you eat its fruit, you are sure to die.”

After God gave the command to Adam, then Eve was made. 


Genesis 2:21-22 “21So the Lord God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep. While the man slept, the Lord God took out one of the man’s ribs and closed up the opening. 22Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib, and he brought her to the man.”


Adam received the command firsthand while Eve received it secondhand. We can see that in Genesis 3:3 but either by Adam’s doing or by Eve’s, something changed in the retelling. The command was added to. When the serpent questioned Eve she added the “or even touch it” bit. 


Genesis 3:3 3“It’s only the fruit from the tree in the middle of the garden that we are not allowed to eat. God said, ‘You must not eat it or even touch it; if you do, you will die.’” 


God never said “do not touch it.” Somewhere between God’s command and Eve’s understanding, an addition was made. And that small addition matters.


Because Eve touched the fruit and did not immediately die, it created space for doubt. The entire command was weakened by a man made in addition to God’s perfect rule.


This doubt, along with her desire and Adam’s passivity which we will take a look at in just a moment is what led to the downfall of creation.


The addition to God’s command is one of the earliest pictures of what we might call religiosity, the adding to of God’s Word in a way that distorts it. 


Now we know that this was an addition to the command and not something like a guardrail. For example, My wife and I have a rule that we will not be alone with a member of the opposite gender other than family. I will not meet with another woman in my office for example. If I have to meet with a woman it's going to be in a very public place. That for us, is a guardrail, but know that that is not a command from God. Its simple pragmatic thinking that prevents Sin from creeping in or rumors of impropriety being created which can lead to doubt creeping in. 


Eve’s addition to make the command stricter than what God had made allowed that doubt to creep in, once she broke that first step, she flirted with sin. Now I don't want to make it sound like Eve was the only one at fault because she definitely was not. Look at what it says in Genesis 3:6


Genesis 3:6 “6The woman was convinced. She saw that the tree was beautiful and its fruit looked delicious, and she wanted the wisdom it would give her. So she took some of the fruit and ate it. Then she gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it, too.”


Adam was right there the whole time! He should’ve walked up and slapped that apple out of her hand the second the Serpent handed it to her. But instead Adam passively sat back and watched this all play out. He watched as God’s command was added to, He watched as she took the fruit, and he watched as she took the bite.


This was interesting to me because it shows how one sin leads to another. And while no sin is greater than another it does show this cascading effect of what can happen when we refuse to step in and stop sin. 


See, Eve ate and apparently nothing happened, Then Adam ate and everything changed. 


Genesis 3:6-7 “6The woman was convinced. She saw that the tree was beautiful and its fruit looked delicious, and she wanted the wisdom it would give her. So she took some of the fruit and ate it. Then she gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it, too. 7At that moment their eyes were opened, and they suddenly felt shame at their nakedness. So they sewed fig leaves together to cover themselves.”


Why? Because the command was given to Adam, the responsibility rested on him. This is why, later in Scripture, sin is consistently traced back to Adam (Romans 5:12) , not Eve.


Would sin still have entered the world if Adam had not taken the bite? I don't know, I'm not claiming that that is the case, but I do find it funny the order of operations here. Eve ate and seemingly, nothing happened. If I was Adam I think I would've had some doubt in God's command in that moment where Eve had eaten and she still was alive. 


Doubt, it's such a powerful force. We hear of how powerful faith is, but doubt, just a little of it played a part in the whole collapse of all of creation. I find that line of reasoning so intriguing. 


What has doubt led you to do in your life? For myself, doubting God's provision for one, has led me to work on things that did not matter, did not produce fruit and ultimately led to nothing but pain. For you maybe it's doubt in your spouse and you’ve grown distant, maybe it's led you to something you can't take back. I don't know what it is for you but I know God can work it for good.


The Effects of Sin: Shame and Blame

The moment sin entered the picture everything changed.

Genesis 3:10 “10He replied, ‘I heard you walking in the garden, so I hid. I was afraid because I was naked.’”


For the first time, humanity becomes aware of its own inadequacy and we immediately try to fix it ourselves. 


They sew the fig leaves then they hide, Then what happens when they are finally confronted? They shift the blame.


Genesis 3:12-13 “12The man replied, ‘It was the woman you gave me who gave me the fruit, and I ate it.’ 13Then the Lord God asked the woman, ‘What have you done?’ ‘The serpent deceived me,’ she replied. ‘That’s why I ate it.’”


Sin produced a pattern that still exists today. 


Awareness of brokenness 

Attempted self-covering

Avoidance of God

Blame others. 


Nothing about human nature has changed.


God’s Response

Genesis 3:16-19 “16Then he said to the woman, ‘I will sharpen the pain of your pregnancy, and in pain you will give birth. And you will desire to control your husband, but he will rule over you.’ 17And to the man he said, ‘Since you listened to your wife and ate from the tree whose fruit I commanded you not to eat, the ground is cursed because of you. All your life you will struggle to scratch a living from it. 18It will grow thorns and thistles for you, though you will eat of its grains. 19By the sweat of your brow will you have food to eat until you return to the ground from which you were made. For you were made from dust, and to dust you will return.’” 


God gave the command to Adam, that's why when after he ate it, sin entered the picture and that's why God reminds him of the Command and specifically calls him out for breaking it and not the woman. Yes there is punishment for all, but responsibility falls to Adam.


After the punishment something cool happens though, we see the first look at God’s grace. God sacrificed the first animal to make clothing and cover Adam and Eve. 


Genesis 3:21 “21And the Lord God made clothing from animal skins for Adam and his wife.” 


This moment foreshadows the entire gospel, and it is the second prophecy of Jesus (Genesis 3:15 being the first). The sacrifice that is to come to cover all of our iniquities.


Tree of Life and Living water 

Up until now Genesis made a lot of sense to me and I could follow the meaning pretty easily but then I got to Genesis 3:22


Genesis 3:22 “22Then the Lord God said, ‘Look, the human beings have become like us, knowing both good and evil. What if they reach out, take fruit from the tree of life, and eat it? Then they will live forever!’” 


So I thought to myself. “Is this also foretelling Jesus or is this something else? Does this mean that there could have been another way to God but because of our sin God will no longer accept that way since we would be ‘doing it on our own’ and he wants us to get to him through Jesus and not our own works?” But that didn't make sense since we were already with God in the Garden so why put the tree of life there in the first place? 


I actually started researching where else in the bible the tree of life was mentioned and came across something beautiful. We find two more mentions of the tree of life and its fruit in revelation.


Revelation 2:7 “7 “Anyone with ears to hear must listen to the Spirit and understand what he is saying to the churches. To everyone who is victorious I will give fruit from the tree of life in the paradise of God.” 


Jesus says that whoever is victorious, He will give them fruit from the Tree of Life. The fruit is His to give, not ours to take. See we must first “wash our robes” by asking to be forgiven of our sins and allow Jesus to wash us clean. Then we will be permitted to eat from the Tree of Life 


Revelation 22:14 “14Blessed are those who wash their robes. They will be permitted to enter through the gates of the city and eat the fruit from the tree of life.”


We have this beautiful symmetry from the very beginning of the Bible to the very end.


First we lose access to the fruit of the Tree of Life because of our Sins.


Then in the middle we see that the idea of the Tree of Life is internalized and reflected as wisdom through Godly living. Proverbs 3:18, 11:30, 13:12, 15:4


And at the end through the redemptive power of Jesus, God gives us a path back to the fruit of the Tree of Life.


What beautiful symmetry.


So back to the three points of provision,  


First, there was some kind of real need. It implies that there was a lack, something that we were missing. God knew that we did not need Eden then but that in the end we would.


Second, that need was met in a timely or meaningful way. God created the most perfect way for us all to meet him and be with him. Eden is still needed and its true purpose is still to be fulfilled.


And third, it had purpose, it was not just coincidence. It should be obvious by now what the purpose is but if it is not, the fruit of the tree of life is its purpose. The fruit of one tree led to our death while the fruit of the second leads to life and its being preserved for the appropriate time and it is Jesus’s right to distribute that fruit. 


God created us free will even in the Garden, and knew that us eating of the Tree of the knowledge of good and evil was always a possibility and so when he created it he created a way for us to be restored at the same time.


Final Thoughts

How beautiful is that?

From the very beginning, God knew. He knew we would doubt. He knew we would add to His Word. He knew that we would stand by when we should have acted. He knew we would reach for what was not ours to take.

And still, He planted the Garden.

Not because Eden was the end goal, but because it was always pointing to something greater.

We lost access to the Tree of Life, not because God was withholding something good from us, but because He was preserving something far better for us. What we tried to take in Genesis, Christ now offers to give in Revelation.

That changes how we should view everything. It changes how we view sin, not just as disobedience, but as misplaced trust. It changes how we view doubt, not as harmless, but as something that quietly reshapes our decisions. And it changes how we view God, not as distant, but as intentional from the very beginning.

So the question becomes:

Where in your life are you reaching for something God never asked you to take?

Where have you added to His Word in a way that’s creating confusion instead of clarity?

And where has doubt caused you to step outside of what you know to be true?

Because the story of Eden isn’t just about what happened then, it’s about what’s happening now.

But the good news is this, the same God who removed access to the Tree of Life in Genesis is the same God who offers it again through Jesus in Revelation.

Not because we earned it. Not because we figured it out. But because He made a way.

Eden was never the destination. It was the beginning of a story that ends with restoration.


Comments


If you are looking for a practical way to support me, consider subscribing to my blog.

bottom of page